The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) discusses planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria. It applies to the Department of Defense and its Agencies and Field Activities. Discuss the requirements of the UFC and how they have evolved over time.
Based on a book by Jacob A. Riis called “How the Other Half Lives” (Second Edition) ISBN-13: 978-0-312-57401-7
For this short essay, an introductory paragraph is not necessary. A brief introductory statement will do. Your body paragraphs should each begin with a general statement followed by specific, detailed evidence, and example(s) that support the opening line. Your next body paragraph answers another aspect of the question with all supporting detail following its opening statement. Two or three of these paragraphs will suffice. Your conclusion is NOT a restating of your previous answers, but an analysis of these various statements and their supporting evidence that leads the argument, and the reader, in a direction ( a conclusion). When you use the ideas or direct words or ideas of author Jacob Riis and editor David Leviatin cite the page number, for example (p 117). You MUST use quotation marks when directly taking words from the book. Seek help at the Sierra College Writing Center (a proofreader at least).
Choose One question from the following four groups (only 1 question per group) and write a 350-500 word essay. Follow the instructions in the Sierra College writing guide (available at the Sierra College Library). Identify by number/letter each essay that you answer; have your work proofread. [you answer two questions; for example: Sect. I = #2; Sect. II = #3 ].
Answer ONE essay from the following four questions.
Section I: These questions focus on Part I the Introduction by David Leviatin, and Part II chapters I – IV of the original work by Jacob Riis.
Answer ONE essay of the following three from Section I:
1. One of the important aspects of Riiss work as a journalist in the 1870s and with this book was that his methodology encompassed many elements that were found in the era of Progressive reform after 1895. Explain any TWO of the following: (a) his artistic style of realism; (b) his use of scientific findings; (c) his need to expose the worst ills of U.S. society; (d) his criticism of working class urban poor from a middle class set of moral beliefs (though he had spent years as a member of the class he critiqued).
2. Comment about the technologies and innovations Riis embraced in photography and combining them with text. When his subject was delivered as an illustrated lecture Leviatin said it was most effective (in an era just prior to the invention of moving film and long before documentary film). In these lectures, as well as this book, what is the tone of his writing toward his audience? Did you find this tone effective when he employed it?
3. Chapters I through IV focus on his interest in studying and condemning the poor design of tenement housing in NYC. What did he find specifically about rents, sanitation, crowding, mortality rates, and the design of rear-tenements?
Choose a topic of your choice that relates to the materials covered during the fifth and sixth weeks of the course, examine it in detail though the eyes of a physical security analyst / manager, and write a short research paper on it. This is your opportunity to explore in-depth a topic that you have a greater interest in than what we covered during the course.
Patient-centered care refers to the management of care across the lifespan where dignity, spirituality, cultural context and rights of the individual, family and community are respected. Nurses play a role in advocating patient-centered policy for LGBTQ community. In this discussion question, you will discuss the following:
What are the LGBTQ rights in the United States?
How can nurses advocate for healthcare policy for the LGTBQ community.
Describe a professional nursing experience in which you provided nursing care for a LGBTQ patient. Did you provide patient-centered care? Give examples.
What are the most important aspects of the US AML legal framework? Why?
Engage our law academic writers and get high-quality paper. We give 100% unplagiarized papers and we strive to obtain an A.
Our services are cheap and you get your paper on time.
Let us know if you need an original paper answering the above question.
The most common research technique for researchers is qualitative data such as document analysis, participant observations, and interviews. However, it is not generally the case that researchers will find adequate information while using qualitative research techniques, particularly when examining scholarly research. One alternative research technique that students can utilize is quantitative analysis because it is based on popular methods such as questionnaires and statistical records analysis. The advantage of using quantitative research techniques is that data is ‘objectively’ measured in numbers and analyzed through statistical analysis and numerical comparisons (Noyes et al., 2019). The research data students obtain using quantitative analysis is deemed more ‘scientific’ and more objective than conclusions drawn from qualitative data.
Another research technique students can adopt is using different databases to widen their search. For instance, research databases such as PubMed, JSTOR, and Science Direct have distinct scholarly articles that could contain the information the student is searching for. While using these databases, students should use a variety of search terms to widen their scope of research and hopefully find something useful. Students can also try searching for information in government databases because they often contain objective information. Also, learners can choose to use the case study research technique to conduct an in-depth study of the research topic.
Outline for Book: The curious researcher: A guide to writing research papers by Ballenger
- The book, The curious researcher: A guide to writing research papers by Ballenger (2018) highlights the need to first conduct ample research on the context of the topic under study.
- The research should focus on the kind of audience to target, the structure to adopt, the narrator to recount the information, and the types of evidence to include.
- First Week
- In the first week, a researcher should get curious about the information he is about to relay.
- Some of the exercises that should be conducted in the first week include building an interest inventory, identify myths of the topic, develop a bibliography and create a research proposal.
- The Second Week
- In the second week, the researcher should identify good sources of information.
- It is also a good opportunity to build focused knowledge and search library databases for articles and books.
- The researcher should also conduct interviews and surveys.
- Third and Fourth Week
- During the third week, the focus should be on taking notes from identified sources.
- It is also an opportunity to avoid plagiarism while note-taking.
- In the fourth week, the researcher should emphasize on organizing and preparing to write a draft of the entire work.
- The book talks about the researcher using the draft to write the article or book.
- The book should be written with the reader’s response and perspective in mind.
Unit III Discussion Board
Plagiarism, which occurs in many forms such as copying direct work, paraphrasing, and using copyrighted academic material without acknowledging the author/publisher is a serious issue in the academic world. It can be intentional and accidental as Aaron and Greer (2019) note. One of the major reasons why it has become a serious issue is the emergence of online databases and webpages where information on any discipline is easily accessible through the click of a link. While the internet has made plagiarism easy, it has also allowed instructors to check material from search engines and find the specific pages or documents where the information was copied or paraphrased (Aaron & Greer, 2019). Therefore, when people copy/paraphrase or use the information without acknowledging the author, it does not only violate copyright terms but also defeats the goal of research which is to achieve learning through critical thinking and creativity.
I would certainly feel agitated if someone used my ideas and claimed them as their own. For instance, I would file a lawsuit if someone used wholly or copied a section of my bachelors, Masters, or Doctorate thesis and used it as part of his/her research without appropriately acknowledging my work of published content. The process of conducting research studies is an intensive one and requires significant resources in terms of academic time and money to complete (Ballenger, 2018). For instance, gathering data and empirical evidence calls for rigorous nationwide or global surveys and experiments. Additionally, books and journal papers require significant sums of money to publish. Therefore, it is certainly not right to utilize someone’s ideas whether copyrighted or not without acknowledging them in the form of appropriate citations, referencing, or other agreements.
Aaron, J. E., & Greer, M. (2019). The Little, Brown compact handbook, 10th edition. Pearson. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780134680927
Ballenger, B. (2018). The curious researcher: A guide to writing research papers, 9th edition Pearson. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780134506739
Unit III Homework Assignment: Gender and Attractiveness
Having monologue and dialogue conversations helps the concerned groups acquire the required facts concerning the issue being discussed. For example, from the article the issue being discussed is about the attractiveness level between women and men in the United States (Ballenger, 2018). First, the story mainly provides that United States women consider the men’s attraction as being unfavorable. The discussion involved an undefined group of women, who agreed that 80 percent of men’s attractiveness was worse than women’s (Ballenger, 2018). The missing facts are that the author of the magazine did not point out the core reasons as to why the attractiveness of men is unfavorable compared to women.
In step 2, the disparity is all about how United States men judge women’s attractiveness naturally. However, the article does not provide the exact number of men that were interrogated. Instead, it provides that men judged only 20 percent of women as having a worse average level of attractiveness (Ballenger, 2018). The missing facts from the article are that men only focused on the natural and physical beauty factors while making judgments. Each of the studies considers attractiveness as the affection individuals get from others through natural and physical beauty judgments. The magazine is more reliable because it comprehensively covers the two gender groups and explains why the two have different reasons and judgments about the level of attractiveness.
Individuals perceive gender attractiveness based on physical judgments such as tattoos (Molloy & Wagstaff, 2021). However, some people view tattooed women as bondage to physical attractiveness, but others consider it an appeal for self-rated attractiveness. Therefore, it is good to realize that physical appearances have a significant effect on gender attractiveness judgment.
Ballenger, B. (2018). The curious researcher: A guide to writing research papers (9th ed.). Pearson Publishing.
Molloy, K., & Wagstaff, D. (2021). Effects of gender, self-rated attractiveness, and mate value on perceptions tattoos. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110382.
Unit VI Discussion Board
With the information I have gathered about writing sources, I feel that I am ready to start my research. Before reading the course textbooks and other class materials, I had a feeling of paranoia about instances of plagiarism. The technical details associated with plagiarism and the citation process can also be distracting and overwhelming (Ballenger, 2018). I believe that I have gained control since I have chosen my writing voice as well as the purpose of writing projects. I also feel less constrained by documentation and citation demands. I now understand that the research question should guide the entire writing process so that sources used revolve around the theme of the paper.
One of my main setbacks is integrating materials in the paper. Sometimes, I do not understand how to integrate different sources in a single page within the research project while ensuring coherence and relevance. As I was going through the course textbook, I realized that there is active and passive blending when it comes to different types of quotations. I feel that understanding where and when to use these quotations is a major drawback. I also fear that the readers may fail to see the triangleness of my draft. Ballenger (2018) describes the triangleness of a draft as the pieces that define the paragraphs and sentences within the write-up. Finally, I have an issue with seeing mistakes in my research.
I have the difference between mistakes and fallacies. Although both can be committed unintentionally, innocently, and inadvertently, the difference lies in the rationalization after the pressure to change is withdrawn. A person is said to use a fallacy to benefit from a scenario if he/she reverts to the old ways once the reason for the change has been taken away (Aaron & Greer, 2019). Elsewhere, an action is considered a mistake if it does not reoccur once cautioned. I found the revelation surprising since most of the actions we call mistakes are actually fallacies. I also discovered that generalization ignores the uniqueness of situations and objects. Each object is uniquely different from the other. Therefore, one situation cannot be used to describe another. In writing, one scenario cannot be used to express another since there are inherent differences that may make such correlations wrong.
Aaron, J. E., & Greer, M. (2019). The Little, Brown compact handbook (10th ed.). Pearson Education Learning.
Ballenger, B. (2018). The curious researcher: A guide to writing research papers (9th ed.). Pearson Education Learning.